PE Valve Bags — Engineering, Performance, and Smart Traceability (2025 Guide)

What are PE valve bags, what are they also called, what are their features, how are they made, and where are they used?

PE valve bags are heavy‑duty, thermoplastic packaging sacks designed for rapid, low‑dust filling of powders, granules, and pellets on impeller, auger/screw, or air‑packer lines. A short internal sleeve—the valve—mates with the filling spout; after dosing, the product head pressure helps self‑close the valve, which can also be heat‑ or ultrasonic‑sealed for enhanced tightness. In industry parlance, you may encounter aliases such as poly valve bags, valve‑type poly sacks, block‑bottom PE valve bags, PVSE‑style poly bags (by analogy with pasted valve stepped‑end geometry), and film valve sacks.

Features of PE valve bags
• Fast, repeatable filling rates with minimal operator exposure to dust.
• Self‑closing or sealable valve constructions (tuck‑in, inner sleeve, sonic/heat seal).
• Welded block‑bottom geometry for square stacks and high pallet stability.
• Tunable barrier by film gauge and co‑extrusion; optional micro‑perforation for de‑aeration.
• Large print area (surface or reverse flexographic) for branding and regulatory markings.
• Mono‑material design that can align with poly‑film recycling streams where available.

How PE valve bags are manufactured (process overview)

1. Film extrusion. Polyethylene resin (LDPE/LLDPE/MDPE blends) is blown or cast into mono‑ or co‑extruded film; gauge typically runs from 100–300 μm depending on product risk.
2. Surface preparation & printing. The film is corona‑treated or primed; graphics are applied by surface or reverse flexo (1–8 colors). Reverse print protects ink between layers, yielding scuff‑resistant, glossy art.
3. Tube forming & bottom welding. Film is folded and welded (heat/ultrasonic) into a tube; gussets and a block‑bottom are welded to create a flat, self‑standing base.
4. Valve construction. A PE fabric/film sleeve is inserted and sized to the packer spout ID; options include tuck‑in valves, sonic‑seal closures, or pre‑applied hot‑melt zones for post‑fill sealing.
5. Venting strategy. Micro‑perforation maps (laser/mechanical) or porous patches balance fill speed with dust control.
6. Quality gates. Film tensile and impact (e.g., method families equivalent to ASTM D882/D1709), sack drop tests (e.g., ISO 7965‑2 class), seal integrity, and coefficient‑of‑friction for pallet stability.

Where PE valve bags are used (primary uses)
Salts and minerals, industrial sands, fertilizers, resins and polymer pellets, animal nutrition (certain kibbles/premixes), energy/biomass (pellets), and select food ingredients that benefit from high moisture tolerance and robust welded seams. When outdoor storage, rain splash, or condensation is part of the route, PE valve bags often deliver a safety margin that paper formats cannot match without complex barriers.

Want a one‑page overview of formats and related heavy‑duty poly packaging? Visit the product family page here: PE valve bags.

---

Why PE valve bags: a problem–solution–result narrative

Bulk packaging lives at the intersection of physics, hygiene, and logistics. Powders aerate; pallets lean; humidity infiltrates; graphics scuff. PE valve bags exist to tame this chaos. Their logic is simple yet powerful: ductile film to resist puncture, welded seams to prevent corner leaks, valve geometry to speed fill and self‑close, micro‑perfs to vent air without venting product. What follows is a systems approach—horizontal comparisons across domains (barrier, machinability, brand) and vertical reasoning from micro‑properties (film gauge, perforation) to macro‑outcomes (claim rates, OEE, shelf life).

---

Barrier and moisture management for PE valve bags

Humidity is ruthless. Hygroscopic powders clump; salts bridge; gypsum degrades. Film is your shield. In PE valve bags, barrier performance derives from gauge, polymer blend, and seam continuity. A welded block‑bottom minimizes ingress paths, while optional inner lap seals at the valve create near‑hermetic closures for rainy yards or maritime legs.

Data‑reinforced levers
• Gauge selection: 160–220 μm (≈4–7 mil) serves most 20–50 kg industrial fills; heavier gauges (≥200 μm) add puncture margin for coarse, angular products or aggressive handling.
• Blend tuning: MDPE layers improve stiffness; LLDPE layers enhance tear and puncture; tie layers can stabilize reverse print laminations.
• Seam design: Continuous welds across base panels distribute impact and stop wicking—critical where pallets meet rain or condensate.

Result pattern: When barrier is matched to route humidity, complaint rates for caking and clumping drop, rework declines, and warehouse housekeeping lightens because product stays in the sack, not on the pallet deck.

---

Breathability, de‑aeration, and dust control

Filling is a race between solids and air. If air cannot escape, powders fountain; if holes are too liberal, fines leak. PE valve bags use micro‑perforation maps to create preferential air paths that keep dust counts down while maintaining BPM. Because film is less inherently breathable than paper, map design matters: hole size (e.g., 50–200 μm), density (e.g., 4–16 holes/cm²), and placement (away from the valve line) are tuned to particle size and flowability.

Practical heuristics
• Fine powders (<150 μm): smaller, sparser micro‑perfs; consider inner valve seal to suppress post‑fill drift.
• Medium granules (0.5–3 mm): denser perf stripes enable fast de‑aeration with negligible sifting.
• Pellets (>3 mm): minimal perfing; rely on valve cut‑off and welded seams for cleanliness.

Operator reality: Less dust at the spout equals better visibility, fewer PPE complaints, and shorter cleanup cycles. Your line team will notice.

---

Strength, drop performance, and puncture resistance

Real life is rude to sacks. Edges bite, forks scrape, pallets shift. Film’s ductility is your ally: it stretches before it tears, and when it does fail, it tends to do so gradually rather than catastrophically. PE valve bags leverage film mechanics and welded bottoms to translate impact into survivable deformation.

Engineering notes
• Falling‑dart impact (method families akin to ASTM D1709) correlates with resistance to punctures from pellets and angular grains.
• Film tensile (akin to ASTM D882) and tear values anchor load‑bearing and snag behavior.
• Sack drop tests (e.g., ISO 7965‑2 classes) simulate floor‑level mishandling: face, edge, and corner drops across multiple orientations.
• Anti‑slip surfaces (sanded or embossed) mitigate pallet creep and leaning stacks.

Field translation: Up‑gauging from 160 μm to 200 μm on resin pellets may cut puncture returns disproportionately—small mass, big risk mitigation.

---

Machinability and throughput on modern packers

Speed is seductive, yet stability wins the day. PE valve bags can match or exceed paper formats on air/impeller packers when mouth pre‑creasing, valve sleeve stiffness, and perf strategy are dialed in. Valve ID must fit spout OD with a comfortable margin (typically +3–6 mm) to avoid dribble while preventing blow‑back. Sonic‑seal closures reduce operator intervention and deliver tidy, tamper‑evident finishes.

Line‑fit checklist
• Spout OD vs. valve ID; set tolerances for hot/humid shifts.
• Bag pick‑up method (vacuum fingers vs. mechanical grippers) and coefficient of friction; consider anti‑block coatings on film stacks.
• Weigh cell stability and de‑aeration windows; validate perf maps at production BPM, not lab speed.
• Valve length: too long and you trap air; too short and you invite dribble.

Outcome: Clean cut‑offs, fewer mis‑seats, better OEE.

---

Printability, branding, and variable data

Your sack is a billboard and a certificate. PE valve bags support surface flexo for vivid solids and reverse print for scuff‑proof glossy finishes. With proper corona treatment or primer, ink anchorage is strong; with reverse print, graphics are protected by the film itself. Variable data—lot codes, date stamps, 2D barcodes—can be over‑printed inline. If you intend to serialize every bag, reserve quiet zones and contrast ratios for camera systems to pass at line speed.

Design moves
• Large solids + fine text: Optimize plate line weights; avoid excessive ink laydown that slows curing.
• Rugged logistics: Favor reverse print to guard art from pallet rub.
• Sustainability cues: Use icons and copy that match local recycling streams; avoid greenwashing claims you cannot audit.

---

Sustainability, compliance, and audit readiness

Mono‑material simplicity is the headline. PE valve bags can flow to #2/#4 film recycling streams where infrastructure exists; where it does not, their lower mass per bag can still shrink transport emissions per unit compared with heavier multi‑material options. For food‑adjacent uses, ensure your polyethylene grades align with prevailing food‑contact frameworks (e.g., regional equivalents to EU 10/2011 for plastics; U.S. CFR provisions for olefin polymers) and keep supplier Declarations of Compliance on file.

Systems that signal maturity
• Documented sack tests (film tensile/impact; sack drop) tied to incoming QC.
• Packaging safety certifications (packaging equivalents of GFSI schemes) for food‑grade operations.
• Artwork controls (approval workflows) that prevent misprints of lot/expiry and regulatory text.

Net effect: Faster supplier audits, smoother retailer approvals, fewer headaches for your QA lead.

---

Cost, risk, and supply resilience

Resin prices move; logistics bite; demand surges. PE valve bags offer flexible gauge control (e.g., 200 → 180 μm) to tune cost without re‑plating artwork. Dual‑qualifying film extruders hedges outage risk; pre‑approving alternative valve sleeves and perf maps creates room to maneuver when supply tightens. Keep plate‑ready art files so changeovers are about scheduling, not re‑origination.

Risk logic
Downgauging saves resin but narrows puncture margins; upgauging spends resin but buys lower returns. The optimum lives where return costs and material costs meet. Model it; then field‑check it.

---

Smart packaging & traceability on PE valve bags

Connected packaging is no longer a novelty; it is an expectation. PE valve bags work well with both 2D codes (QR/DataMatrix—ideally in the GS1 Digital Link format that encodes GTIN + lot/expiry + URL) and UHF RFID inlays. Reverse‑printed film protects 2D graphics; film layers can also house thin RFID inlays under the print so they survive pallet rub.

From code to dashboard—system thinking
Identifier → event capture at fill and palletization → data model (GTIN/lot/expiry/location) → cloud/ERP → role‑aware front‑ends (warehouse, receiver, consumer). Bags do not become “smart” in isolation; printers, validators, scanners, and WMS integrations must be designed together. Pilot on one SKU, then scale.

Design notes
• Place 2D codes in scuff‑sheltered zones (upper sidewall, block‑bottom panel).
• For RFID, avoid metalized inks directly over inlays; validate read ranges on full pallets.
• Keep quiet zones generous; camera graders are strict at speed.

---

Integrated selection framework for PE valve bags

1. Product physics: particle size distribution, bulk density, oil/fat content, hygroscopicity.
2. Route stresses: pallet height, drop orientations, humidity/temperature windows, outdoor exposure.
3. Bag geometry: block‑bottom vs. pillow (most PE valve bags are block‑bottom for stance); valve type (tuck‑in/sonic seal).
4. Venting plan: micro‑perf size, density, and placement relative to powder aeration behavior.
5. Graphics & data: surface vs. reverse print; variable data real estate; 2D/RFID placement.
6. Compliance pack: relevant film tests, sack drop classes, food‑contact DoCs, artwork approval controls.
7. Trials & validation: 10‑bag drop matrix across faces and corners; humidity chambers where relevant; read‑rate trials for codes/inlays; ramp plan after passing gates.

---

Specification table — typical real‑world ranges for PE valve bags

Parameter	Typical Options / Range	Notes
Capacity (net)	10–50 kg (common); special up to 5–60 kg	Calibrate to bulk density and pallet plan
Film structure	Mono‑ or co‑extruded PE blends (LDPE/LLDPE/MDPE)	Co‑ex enables reverse‑print protection
Thickness (gauge)	160–220 μm common; 100–300 μm possible	Heavier gauges for puncture‑prone loads
Dimensions	Width 38–70 cm, length 47–130 cm, gusset 10–18 cm	Match to spout reach and pallet footprint
Valve type	Inner sleeve, tuck‑in, sonic/heat‑seal	Valve ID spout OD +3–6 mm typical
Venting	Micro‑perfs 50–200 μm; 4–16 holes/cm²; mapped zones	Keep perfs away from valve line
Printing	Surface or reverse flexo, 1–8 colors	Corona/primer for ink anchorage
Surface finish	Smooth, sanded, or embossed anti‑slip	Improves pallet stability
Tests (film)	Tensile/elongation (family akin to ASTM D882); impact (akin to ASTM D1709)	Incoming QC and retention samples
Tests (sack)	Filled‑bag drop (e.g., ISO 7965‑2 class); seal integrity	Include face/edge/corner orientations
Food contact	Regional plastics frameworks; DoCs from film/ink suppliers	Maintain migration test files where applicable
Recyclability	Poly film streams (#2/#4) where supported	Mono‑material advantage

---

Closure options comparison within PE valve bags

Closure	Cleanliness	Equipment	Tamper Evidence	Typical Use
Self‑closing valve (no seal)	Good for medium granules	Standard packer	Low	Sands, pellets
Tuck‑in valve	Better dust hold‑back	Minor set‑up	Medium	Powders with moderate fines
Sonic/heat‑seal valve	Near‑hermetic	Ultrasonic/heat unit	High	Hygroscopic powders, outdoor storage

---

Field scenarios (problem → solution → result)

A. Outdoor fertilizer (20–25 kg)
Problem: Rain splash at yards causes label smear and agglomeration; punctures occur on forklift tines.
Solution: PE valve bags at ≥180 μm, reverse‑printed graphics, embossed anti‑slip, sonic‑sealed valve, micro‑perf stripes set back from the valve.
Result: Pallet faces stay clean, puncture claims drop, receiving scans of 2D codes pass despite yard grime.

B. Resin pellets for export (25 kg)
Problem: Corner ruptures in mixed‑cargo containers lead to pellet loss and cleanup fees.
Solution: Up‑gauge to 200 μm, specify welded block‑bottom and stiffer valve sleeve to seat positively on the spout; add sanded finish to stabilize stacks.
Result: Corner drops survive; leaning stacks disappear; returns decline.

C. Mineral fines (15–20 kg)
Problem: Fines migrate through perf fields; operators complain of airborne dust at the spout.
Solution: Reduce perf diameter and density; relocate perf zones away from the valve; add optional valve heat seal after fill.
Result: Dust exposure readings improve; housekeeping time shrinks; BPM recovers.

D. Animal nutrition kibbles (25 kg)
Problem: Abrasion scuffs artwork; mouth dribble extends cycle time.
Solution: Reverse‑print film; tune valve length to spout OD; trial tuck‑in valve to arrest dribble.
Result: Graphics remain legible after truck rub; cycle time shortens; pallet presentation improves.

---

FAQ for engineers and buyers of PE valve bags

Are PE valve bags recyclable?
Often yes, when film‑only poly streams (#2/#4) exist. Always verify local acceptance and keep laminations simple.

How do I size the valve to my packer?
Measure spout OD and add a pragmatic clearance (often +3–6 mm). Validate on a 10‑bag pilot at production BPM.

Do I need micro‑perfs for granules?
Sometimes not. Over‑perforation can invite dust where none existed; run with minimal perfing for coarse products.

What’s the fastest path to serialization?
Reserve a high‑contrast, scuff‑sheltered panel for GS1‑format 2D codes; add inline printers/validators; consider RFID at pallet level first.

Paper vs. poly—how to choose?
If humidity and puncture risk dominate, PE valve bags tend to win. If de‑aeration speed and paper‑stream recovery dominate, paper valve sacks have advantages. Many portfolios run both.

---

Working glossary (selected)

Block‑bottom — Folded and welded base that stands flat for stable stacking.
Micro‑perforation — Tiny holes (tens to hundreds of microns) to vent entrained air during filling.
Reverse print — Graphics printed on the inner face of a film and viewed through the outer layer for abrasion protection.
Sonic‑seal valve — An internal valve sleeve closed by ultrasonic energy after filling for near‑hermetic performance.
GS1 Digital Link — A standard that encodes global trade identifiers plus lot/expiry into a web‑resolvable 2D code.

Understanding PE valve bags Components

Introduction. PE valve bags are heavy‑duty polyethylene sacks that load via an internal sleeve (the valve) on impeller, auger, or air packers and self‑close by product pressure or a post‑fill seal. They look simple; they are not. Every surface, fold, and hole governs flow, dust, and durability.

Method. Decompose the sack into seven functional subsystems: (1) co‑extruded film (LDPE/LLDPE/MDPE stack), (2) block‑bottom weld geometry, (3) valve sleeve (ID/length/stiffness), (4) micro‑perforation map, (5) surface finish (smooth/embossed/sanded), (6) print layer (surface vs. reverse), and (7) additives (UV, antistat). For each, define its role in fill speed, seal integrity, pallet stability, and scuff resistance.

Result. A shared language for engineers and buyers: when a line operator says “the mouth bounces,” we look at sleeve stiffness and pre‑crease; when QA flags corner leaks, we inspect base welds and perf placement.

Discussion. Horizontally, these subsystems intersect—valve ID affects de‑aeration window; perf density feeds dust counts; surface COF rules pallet lean. Vertically, micro‑choices (e.g., 160 vs. 200 μm gauge) ripple upward into macro‑outcomes (returns, OEE, safety).

Common Elements and Options in PE valve bags

Introduction. What are the recurring building blocks and configurable options of PE valve bags?

Method. Catalog the choices buyers most frequently specify: film gauge (100–300 μm), blend (stiff MDPE skin with tough LLDPE core), valve type (self‑closing, tuck‑in, sonic/heat‑seal), perf map (50–200 μm holes at 4–16 holes/cm²), finish (embossed/sanded for anti‑slip), and print mode (surface vs. reverse). Optional enhancements: antistatic masterbatch for fines, UV stabilizers for yard storage, recycled content targets, and serialized 2D codes.

Result. A modular palette that lets PE valve bags serve salts, sands, fertilizers, resins, and selected food powders without reinventing the format.

Discussion. Horizontally, options align with cross‑domain needs: safety (dust), logistics (COF), marketing (branding), compliance (food contact). Vertically, the decision chain runs from SKU physics → valve geometry → perf tuning → pallet behavior.

Identifying Critical Design Factors for Longevity

Introduction. Why do some PE valve bags survive months in rough yards while others fail in weeks?

Method. Stress‑map the life cycle: filling impact at the mouth, corner shocks in loading, fork abrasion at pallet edges, UV exposure outdoors, and condensation cycles. For each stressor, pair a design countermeasure: up‑gauge film for puncture, strengthen base weld bridges, specify embossed anti‑slip, add UV stabilizer, and move perf fields away from the valve seam.

Result. Lower split rates, fewer puncture claims, graphics that remain legible, and tidy stacks that don’t creep.

Discussion. Horizontal lens: mechanics (impact), chemistry (UV), and hygiene (dust) co‑determine longevity. Vertical lens: micro‑reinforcements at the seam → fewer corner leaks → less rework → improved total landed cost.

Factors to Consider When Selecting PE valve bags

Introduction. A good spec starts with physics, not price.

Method. Use a decision matrix that converts product and route data into bag parameters.

Result. The table below compresses many meetings into a one‑page map.

Discussion. Each row closes a tiny logic loop—problem, lever, expected outcome—while keeping trade‑offs explicit.

Input (Problem)	Lever in PE valve bags	Expected Outcome
Fine powders (<150 μm) aerate at fill	Smaller/offset perf fields; tuck‑in or sonic‑seal valve	Faster de‑aeration with low dust
Coarse granules (>1 mm) scuff art	Reverse print under film	Legible graphics after transit
Pallets lean in tall stacks	Embossed/sanded finish; block‑bottom weld width	Higher COF, better stack stability
Fork punctures on edges	Up‑gauge to 180–200 μm; broaden weld toes	Fewer corner ruptures
Outdoor storage (rain/UV)	Sonic‑seal valve; UV stabilizer	Lower moisture ingress; slower fade
Serialization/traceability	GS1 2D code panel; optional UHF RFID inlay	High read rates in receiving

Preventing Downtime with Timely Packaging Upgrades

Introduction. Downtime is expensive—and often bag‑driven.

Method. Run short kaizen cycles around the sack: mouth pre‑crease to improve seat‑on‑spout; shorten valve sleeve to curb dribble; retune perf density to meet a target BPM with a dust ceiling; adopt anti‑block treatment to cure double‑picks.

Result. Cleaner cut‑off, fewer mis‑seats, faster resets. Operators stop wrestling with the mouth and start trusting it.

Discussion. Horizontally, small packaging tweaks unlock machine potential. Vertically, a five‑minute sleeve trim can save hours in accumulated stoppages.

The Role of Supplier Service and Technical Support

Introduction. A sack is only as reliable as the team behind it.

Method. Expect your PE valve bags partner to provide line trials, incoming film COAs, sack drop certificates, and artwork control per recognized packaging safety schemes. Ask for change‑control logs and retained sample archives.

Result. Faster audits, no‑drama launches, and shorter root‑cause cycles when something goes wrong.

Discussion. Horizontal gain: procurement, QA, and operations share a single source of truth. Vertical gain: document discipline → predictable quality → brand protection.

Common Challenges When Re‑Specifying to PE valve bags

Introduction. Switching formats is never just a print change.

Method. Anticipate issues: static cling with fine powders, over‑perforation that “leaks speed,” valve IDs that don’t match aging spouts, stacks that slip because films are too glossy. Pre‑solve with antistat additives, conservative perf maps, sleeve/spout gauging, and embossed finishes.

Result. A smoother cutover with measurable BPM and housekeeping wins in week one, not quarter three.

Discussion. Horizontally, EHS, maintenance, and planning must see the same risk list. Vertically, early pilots → fewer emergency reprints → dependable supply.

Available Enhancements for Performance

Introduction. The base bag works; the tuned bag shines.

Method. Layer options onto PE valve bags: sonic‑seal valves for near‑hermetic closure; anti‑slip emboss for tall pallets; reverse print for scuff‑proof art; antistat for dusty ingredients; recycled content for stewardship targets; 2D codes and RFID for traceability.

Result. Higher OEE, cleaner warehouses, stronger shelf presence, and credible sustainability narratives.

Discussion. Horizontal: performance, brand, and compliance improve together. Vertical: a single inlay can collapse hours of cycle counting at the yard into minutes.

The Productivity Impact of Modern PE valve bags

Introduction. Do better sacks really move the productivity needle?

Method. Track three metrics before/after: BPM at rated accuracy, housekeeping hours per shift, and complaint rate per 10,000 bags. Attribute gains to the bag levers you changed (gauge, valve, perf, finish) to avoid confounding.

Result. Plants commonly see double‑digit dust reductions and steadier BPM when valve seating and perf maps are tuned, with fewer pallet reworks due to leaning.

Discussion. Horizontally, productivity is the sum of micro‑wins. Vertically, a single weld upgrade propagates from the packing head to the retailer aisle.

Future‑Proofing with Smart and Sustainable PE valve bags

Introduction. Regulations and retailers are pivoting to connected packaging and clearer end‑of‑life.

Method. Reserve scuff‑sheltered real estate for GS1‑format 2D codes (lot/expiry + web link) and, if your warehouse can read it, add UHF RFID inlays beneath the print layer. Keep the structure mono‑material to fit poly‑film streams where available.

Result. Faster recalls, richer product stories, and simpler recycling instructions. For a fuller view of related heavy‑duty formats, see this page: PE valve bags.

Discussion. Horizontal: IT, quality, and packaging now share one data spine. Vertical: a bag code triggers a dashboard—which triggers decisions.

What Options Do Buyers Order Most Often?

Introduction. Preferences rhyme across industries.

Method. Aggregate orders: 180–200 μm film for outdoor salts and fertilizers; reverse print for export resins; embossed anti‑slip for 1.2–1.5 m pallets; sonic‑seal valves for hygroscopic powders; antistat for dusty blends; serialized 2D codes for lot control.

Result. A practical default kit for new SKUs entering the PE valve bags family.

Discussion. Horizontally, these options cut across chemicals, agriculture, and food ingredients. Vertically, each option addresses a specific failure mode: puncture, smear, slip, or traceability gaps.

How to Keep Your PE valve bags Program Performing for Years

Introduction. Longevity is a process, not luck.

Method. Institute quarterly spec reviews (gauge, valve, perf), dual‑qualify film suppliers, retain pass/fail drop samples, and maintain artwork approval workflows. When complaints occur, trace to batch via printed 2D code and adjust a single lever at a time.

Result. Stable cost, fewer surprises, validated changes, and a calmer plant.

Discussion. Horizontally, finance and ops finally speak the same language—risk adjusted total cost. Vertically, disciplined change control compounds into brand equity.

References

1. ISO 7965‑2 — Sacks made from thermoplastic films — Drop test method.
2. ASTM D1709 — Standard Test Methods for Impact Resistance of Plastic Film by the Free‑Falling Dart Method.
3. ASTM D882 — Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting.
4. EU 10/2011 — Plastics materials and articles intended to come into contact with food.
5. 21 CFR 177.1520 — Olefin polymers for food contact in the United States.
6. BRCGS Packaging Materials (Issue 6/7) — Artwork control and packaging safety requirements.
7. GS1 Digital Link & 2D Barcode migration resources — Guidelines for encoding GTIN + lot/expiry for connected packaging.
8. Supplier datasheets for LDPE/LLDPE/MDPE blends — Typical COF, tensile, and dart ranges used in PE valve bags engineering.